MELETIUS OF ANTIOCH (d. 381)

This article appears in Volume V18, Page 94 of the Encyclopedia Britannica.

Encyclopedia Britannica - Main :: MEC-MIC

MELETIUS OF ANTIOCH (d. 381) , Catholic bishop and saint, was born at Melitene in Lesser Armenia of wealthy and noble parents. He first appears (c. 357) as a supporter of Acacius,bishop elf Caesarea, the leader of that party in the episcopate which supported the Homoean

formula

by which the emperor Constantius sought to effect a compromise between the Homoeusians and the Homousians. Meletius thus makes his debut as an ecclesiastic of the court party, and as such became bishop of Sebaste in succession to Eustathius, deposed as an Homousian heretic by the synod of Melitene. The appointment was resented by the Homoeusian clergy, and Meletius retired to Beroea. According to Socrates he attended the synod of Seleucia in the , autumn of 359, and then subscribed the Acacian

formula

. Early in 36o he became bishop of Antioch, in succession to Eudoxius, who had been raised to the see of Constantinople. Early in the following year he was in

exile

EXILE (Lat. exsilium or exilium, from exsul or exul, which is derived from ex, out of, and the root sal, to go, seen in salire, to leap,
consul
- CONSUL
- CONSUL (in Gr. generally ihraros,ashortened form of errpavgybs 8hraeos, i.e. praetor maximus)
, &c.; the connexion with solum, soil, country is now generally considered wrong)

. According to an old tradition, supported by evidence

drawn

DRAWN

from Epiphanius and Chrysostom, this was due to a sermon preached before the emperor Constantius, in which he revealed Homousian views. This explanation, however, is rejected by Loofs; the sermon contains nothing inconsistent with the Acacian position favoured by the court party; on the other hand, there is evidence of conflicts with the clergy, quite apart from any questions of orthodoxy, which may have led to the bishop's deposition.
The successor of Meletius was Euzoeus, who had fallen with Arius under the ban of Athanasius; and Loofs explains the subita fide.i mutajio which St Jerome (ann. Abr. 2376) ascribes to Meletius to the dogmatic opposition of the deposed bishop to his successor. In Antioch itself Meletius continued to have adherents, who held separate services in the " Apostolic " church in the old town. The Meletian schism was complicated, moreover, by the presence in the city of another anti-Arian sect, stricter adherents of the Homousian formula, maintaining the tradition of the deposed bishop Eustathius and governed at this time by the presbyter Paulinus. The synod of Alexandria sent deputies to attempt an arrangement between the two anti-Arian Churches; but before they arrived Paulinus had been consecrated. bishop by Lucifer of Calaris, and when Meletiusfree to return in consequence of the emperor Julian's contemptuous policyreached the city, he found himself one of three rival bishops. Meletius was now between two stools. The orthodox Nicene party, notably Athanasius himself, held communion with Paulinus only; twice, in 365 and 371 or 372, Meletius was exiled by decree of the Arian emperor Valens. A further complication was added when, in 375, Vitalius,' one of Meletius's presbyters, was consecrated bishop by the heretical bishop Apollinaris of Laodicea.
Meanwhile, under the influence of his situation, Meletius had been more and more approximating to the views of the newer school of Nicene orthodoxy. Basil of Caesarea, throwing over the cause of Eustathius, championed that of Meletius who, when after the death of Valens he returned in

triumph

TRIUMPH (triumphus)

to Antioch, was hailed as the leader of Eastern orthodoxy. As such he presided, in October 379, over the

great

GREAT

synod of Antioch, in which the dogmatic agreement of

East

EAST
EAST, ALFRED (1849- )

and West was established; it was he who helped Gregory of Nazianzus to the see of Constantinople and consecrated him; it was he who presided over the second oecumenical council at Constantinople in 381. He died soon after the opening of the council, and the emperor Theodosius, who had received him with especial distinction; caused his

body

BODY

to be carried to Antioch and buried with the honours of a saint. The Meletian schism, however, did not end with his death. In spite of the advice of Gregory of Nazianzus and of the Western Church, the recognition of Paulirms's sole episcopate was refused, Flavian being consecrated as Meletius's successor. TheEustathians, on the other hand, elected Evagrius as bishop on Paulinus's death, and it was not till 415 that Flavian succeeded in re-uniting them to the Church.
Meletius was a holy man, whose ascetic life was all the more remarkable in view of his

great

GREAT

private wealth. He was also a man of learning and culture, and widely esteemed for his honourable, kindly and straightforward character. He is venerated as a saint and confessor in both the Roman Catholic and Orthodox Eastern Churches.
See the article G. F. Loofs in Herzog-Hauck, Realencykloptidie (ed. 1897,

Leipzig

LEIPZIG

), xii. 552, and authorities there cited.

End of Article: MELETIUS OF ANTIOCH (d. 381)

If you wish, you can link directly to this article.

<a href="http://jcsm.org/StudyCenter/Encyclopedia/MEC_MIC/MELETIUS_OF_ANTIOCH_d_381_.html">
MELETIUS OF ANTIOCH (d. 381)
</a>

(Previous)
MELETIUS OF

(Next)
MELETIUS OF LYCOPOLIS (4th century)

JCSM was founded in 1997 and exists to help the community and bring people into a life-changing and productive relationship with Jesus Christ. JCSM offers over 200,000 free web pages, including its weekly inspirational emails that were sent continuously for over a decade.

Jesus Christ Saves Ministries
P.O. Box 9297
San Diego, CA 92169
1-888-887-0417 or Email