FRANKPLEDGE (Lat. francum plegium)

This article appears in Volume V11, Page 35 of the Encyclopedia Britannica.

Encyclopedia Britannica - Main :: FRA-GAE

FRANKPLEDGE (Lat. francum plegium) , an early English institution, consisting (as defined by

Stubbs

) of an association for mutual security whose members, according to Hallam, " were perpetual bail for each other." The custom whereby the inhabitants of a

district

DISTRICT

were responsible for any crime or injury committed by one of their number is old and widespread; it prevailed in England before the Norman Conquest, and is an outcome of the earlier principle whereby this responsibility rested on kinship. Thus a law of Edgar (d. 975) says " and let every man so order that he have a both (or surety), and let the borh then bring and hold him to every justice; and if any one then do wrong and run away, let the borh

bear

that which he ought to

bear

"; and a law of Canute about 1030 says "- and that every one be brought into a hundred and in borh, and let the borh hold and lead him to every plea." About this time these societies, each having its headman, were called frithborhs, or peace-borhs, and the Normans translated the Anglo-Saxon word by frankpledge. But the history of the frankpledge proper begins not earlier than the time of the Norman Conquest. The laws, which although called the laws of Edward the Confessor were not

drawn

DRAWN

up until about 1130, contain a clause about frithborhs which decrees that in every place societies of ten men shall be formed for mutual security and reparation. And before this date William the Conqueror had ordered that " every one who wishes to be regarded as free must be in a pledge, and that the pledge must hold and bring him to justice if he commits any offence "; and the laws of

Henry

I. ordered every person of substance over twelve years of age to be enrolled in a frank-pledge. This association of ten, or as it often was at a later date of twelve men, was also called a tithing, or decima, and in the north of England was known as tenmanne tale.
The view of frankpledge (visus franciplegii), or the duty of ascertaining that the law with regard to frankpledges was complied with, was in the hands of the sheriffs, who held an itinerant court called the " sheriff's tourn " for this and other purposes. This court was held twice a year, but in 1217 it was ordered that the view of frankpledge should only be taken onceat Michaelmas. Introduced at or before the time of

Henry

I., the view was regulated by the Assize of Clarendon of 1166 and
by Magna Carta as reissued in 1217. Although the former of these lays stress upon the fact that the sheriff's supervisory powers are universal many men did not attend his tourn. Some lords of manors and of hundreds held a court of their own for view of frankpledge, and in the 13th century it may be fairly said " of all the franchises, the royal rights in private hands, view of frankpledge is perhaps the commonest." At the end of the same century the court for the view of frankpledge was generally known as the court leet, and was usually a manorial court in private hands. However, the principle of the frank-pledge was still enforced. Thus Bracton says " every male of the age of twelve years, be he free be he serf, ought to be in frankpledge," but he allows for certain exceptions.
As the word frankpledge denotes, these societies were originally concerned only with freemen; but the unfree were afterwards admitted, and during the 13th century the frankpledges were composed chiefly of villains. From petitions presented to

parliament

PARLIAMENT (Anglo-Lat. parliamentum, Fr. parlement, from parler, to speak)

in 1376 it seems that the view of frankpledge was in active operation at this time, but it soon began to fall into disuse, and its complete decay coincides with the new ideas of government introduced by the Tudors. In a formal fashion courts leet for the view of frankpledge were held in the time of the jurist Selden, and a few of these have survived until the present day. Sir F.

Palgrave

TURNER
_1824_1.html">PALGRAVE, FRANCIS
TURNER
(1824-1897)
PALGRAVE, SIR FRANCIS (1788-1861)

has asserted that the view of frankpledge was unknown in that part of the country which had been included in the kingdom of Northumbria. This statement is open to question, but it is highly probable that the system was not so deeply rooted in this part of England as elsewhere. The machinery of the frankpledge was probably used by Henry II. when he introduced the jury of presentment; and commenting on this connexion F. W. Maitland says " the duty of producing one's neighbour to answer accusations (the duty of the frankpledges) could well be converted into the duty of telling tales against him." The system of frankpledge prevailed in some English boroughs. Sometimes a court for view of frankpledge, called in some places a mickleton, whereat the mayor or the bailiffs presided, was held for the whole borough; in other cases the borough was divided into wards, or into leets, each of which had its separate court.
See Pollock and Maitland, History of English Law (1895) ; G.

Waitz

WAITZ, GEORG (1813-1886)
WAITZ, THEODOR (1821-1864)

, Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte, Band i. (188o) ; and W.

Stubbs

, Constitutional History, vol. i. (1897).

End of Article: FRANKPLEDGE (Lat. francum plegium)

If you wish, you can link directly to this article.

<a href="http://jcsm.org/StudyCenter/Encyclopedia/FRA_GAE/FRANKPLEDGE_Lat_francum_plegiu.html">
FRANKPLEDGE (Lat. francum plegium)
</a>

(Previous)
FRANKLINITE

(Next)
FRANKS

JCSM was founded in 1997 and exists to help the community and bring people into a life-changing and productive relationship with Jesus Christ. JCSM offers over 200,000 free web pages, including its weekly inspirational emails that were sent continuously for over a decade.

Jesus Christ Saves Ministries
P.O. Box 9297
San Diego, CA 92169
1-888-887-0417 or Email