-
Skip These Ads
-
Skip These Ads|
|
 |
Click here and add this page to your favorites!
|
Encyclopedia Britannica - Main :: APO-ARN |
|
|
APOSTIL, or APOSTILLE (possibly connected with Lat. appositum, placed near) , a marginal note made by a commentator. APOSTLE (ar6vroXos, one sent forth on a mission, an envoy, as in Is. xviii. 2; Symmachus, arrocriXXety asroor6Xovs; Aquila, pev,6eu-rIts) , a technical term used in the New Testament and in Christian literature generally for a special
The readmission of such apostates to the church was a matter that occasioned serious controversy. The emperor Julian's " Apostasy " is discussed under JULIAN. applied in practice; and so we find " apostle " used in several senses, once it emerges as a technical term. i. In the Apostolic age itself, " apostle " often denotes simply an " envoy," commissioned by Jesus Christ to be a primary witness and preacher of the Messianic Kingdom. This wide sense was shown by Lightfoot (in his commentary on Galatians, 1865) to exist in the New Testament, e.g. in x Cor. xii. 28 f., Eph. iv. 1x, Rom. xvi. 7; and his view has since been emphasized' by the discovery of the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles (see DIDACxE), with its itinerant order of " apostles," who, together with " prophets " (cf. Eph. ii. 20, iii. 5) and teachers," constituted a charismatic and seemingly unordained ministry of the Word, in some part of the Church (in Syria?) during the early sub-apostolic age. Paul is our earliest witness, as just cited; also in x Cor. xv. 5 if., where he seems to quote the language of Palestinian tradition, in saying that Christ "appeared to Cephas; then to the Twelve; then . . . to James; then to the apostles one and all (rois axroar-1 Am 7raolv); and last of all ... to me also." The appearance to " all the Apostles " must refer to the final commission given by the risen Christ to certain assembled disciples (Acts i. 6 if., cf. Luke xxiv. 33), including not only the Twelve and the Lord's brethren (i. 13 f.), but also some at least of the Seventy. Of this wider circle of witnesses, taken from among personal disciples during Jesus's earthly ministry, we get a further glimpse in the election of one from their number to fill Judas's place among the Twelve (i. 21 ff.), as the primary official witnesses of Messiah and his resurrection. Many of the 120 then present (Acts i. 15), and not only the two set forward for final choice, must have been personal disciples, who by the recent
i. 23), if not also Barnabas (1 Cor. ix. 6) and Andronicus and Junia (Rom. xvi. 7). So far, then, we gather that the original
special
It is possible, though not certain, that even those Judaizing missionaries at Corinth whom Paul styles " false-apostles " or, ironically, " the superlative apostles " (2 Cor. xi. 5, 13; xii. ii), rested part of their claim to superiority over Paul on (b), possibly even as having done service to Christ when on earth (2 Cor. xi. 18, 23). There is no sign in 2 Cor. that they laid claim to (a). If this be so, they were " Christ's apostles " only indirectly, " through men " (as some had alleged touching Paul, cf. Gal. i. I), i.e. as sent forth on mission work by certain Jerusalem leaders with letters of introduction (2 Cor. iii. 1; E.ivon Dobschiitz, Probleme der apost. Zeitalters, p. 106). 2. The Twelve.When Jesus selected an inner circle of disciples for continuous training by personal intercourse, his choice of " twelve " had direct reference to the tribes of Israel (Matt. xix. 28; Luke xxii. 30). This gave them a symbolic or representative character as a closed body (cf. Rev. xxi. 14), marking them off as the primary religious authority (cf. Actsii. 42, " the apostles' teaching ") among the " disciples " or " brethren," when these began to assume the form of a community or church. The relationship which other " apostles " had enjoyed with the Master had been uncertain; they had been his recognized intimates, and that as a body. Naturally, then, they took the lead, collectivelyin form at least, though really the initiative lay with one or two of their own number, Peter in particular. The process of practical differentiation from their fellow-apostles was furthered by the concentration of the Twelve, or at least of its most marked representatives, in Jerusalem, for a considerable period (Acts viii, i, cf. xii. x ff.; an early tradition specifies twelve years). Other apostles soon went forth 1 By analogy, that is; for the wider sense of " apostle" in the Apostolic age need not be identical with a sub-apostolic use of the term (see below, 4 fin.).on their mission to " the cities of Israel " (cf. Acts ix. 31)., and so exercised but little influence on the central policy of the Church. Hence their shadowy existence in the New Testament, though the actual wording of Matt. x. 5-42, read in the light of the Didach, may help us to conceive their work in its main features.3. " Pillar " Apostles.But . in fact differentiation between apostles existed among the Twelve also. There were " pillars," like Peter and John (and his brother James until his death), who really determined matters of grave moment, as in the conference with Paul in Gal. ii. 9a conference which laid the basis of the latter's status as an apostle even in the eyes of Jewish Christians. Such pre-eminence was but the sequel of personal distinctions visible even in the preparatory days of discipleship, and it warns us against viewing the primitive facts touching apostles in the official light of later times. Consciousness of such personal pre-eminence has left its marks on the lists of the Twelve in the New Testament. Thus (I) Peter, James, John, Andrew, always appear as the first four, though the order varies, Mark representing relative prominence during Christ's ministry, and Acts actual influence in the Apostolic Church (cf. Luke viii. 51, ix. 28). (2) The others also stand in groups of four, the first name in each being constant, while the order of the rest varies. The same lesson emerges when we note that one such apostolic " pillar " stood outside the Twelve altogether, viz. James, the Lord's brother (Gal. ii. 9, cf. i. 19); and further, that " the Lord's brethren " seem to have ranked above " apostles " generally, being named between them and Peter in r Cor. ix. 5. That is, they too were apostles with the addition of a certain personal distinction. 4. Paul, the " Apostle of the Gentiles."So far apostles are only of the Palestinian type, taken from among actual hearers of the Messiah and with a mission primarily to Jewsapostles "of, the circumcision " (Gal. ii. 7-9). Now, however, emerges a new apostleship, that to the Gentiles; and with the change of mission goes also some change in the type of missionary or apostle. Of this type Paul was the first, and he remained its primary, and in some senses its only, example. Though he could claim, on occasion, to satisfy the old test of having seen the risen Lord (i Cor. ix. 1, cf. xv. 8), he himself laid stress not on this,. but on the revelation within his own soul of Jesus as God's Son, and of the Gospel latent therein (Gal. i. 16). This was his divine call as " apostle of the Gentiles " (Rom. xi. 13); here lay both his qualification and his credentials, once the fruits of the divine inworking were manifest in the success of his missionary work (Gal. ii. 8 f.; x Cor. xi. x f.; 2 Cor. iii. 2 f., xii. 12). But this new criterion of apostleship was capable of wider application, one dispensing altogether with vision of the risen Lordwhich could not even in Paul's case be proved so fully as in the case of the original
gift visible in work done, and particularly in the planting of the Gospel in fresh fields (2 Cor. x. 14-18). It may be in this wide charismatic sense that Paul uses the term in , Cor. xii. 28 f., Eph. ii. 20, iii. 5, iv. 11, and especially in Rom. xvi. 7, " men of mark among the apostles" (cf. 2 Cor. Xi. 13, "pseudo-apostles " masquerading as " apostles of Christ," and perhaps r Thess. ii. 6, of himself and Silas). That he used it in senses differing with the context is proved by x Cor. xv. 9, where he styles himself the Ieast of apostles," although in other connexions he; claims the very highest rank, co-ordinate even with the Twelve as a body (Gal. ii. 7 ff.), in virtue of his distinctive Gospel.This point of view was not widely shared even in circles appreciative of his actual work. To most he seemed but a fruitful worker within lines determined by " the twelve apostles of the Lamb " as a body (Rev. xxi. 14). So we read of " the plant (Church) which the twelve apostles of the Beloved shall plant " (Ascension of Isaiah, iv. 3); " those who preached the Gospel to us (especially Gentiles) . unto whom He gave authority over the Gospel, being twelve for a witness to the tribes " (Barn. viii. 3, cf. v. 9); and the going forth of the 198 Twelve, after twelve years, beyond Palestine " into the world," to give it a chance to hear (Preaching of Peter, in Clem. Alex. Strom. vi. 5. 43; 6. 48). Later on, however, his own claim told on the Church's mind, when his epistles were read in church as a collection styled simply " the Apostle." As the primary medium of the Gentile Gospel (Gal. i. 16, cf. i. 8, ii. 2) Paul had no peers as an " apostle of the Gentiles " (Rom. xi. 13, cf. xv. 15-20, and seer Cor. xv. 8, " last of all to me "), unless it were Barnabas who shares with him the title " apostle " in Acts xiv. 4, 14possibly with reference to the special " work " on which they had recently been " sent forth by the Spirit " (xiii. 2, 4). Yet such as shared the spiritual gift (charisma) of missionary power in sufficient degree, were in fact apostles of Christ in the Spirit (1 Cor. xii. 28, II). Such a secondary type of apostolateanswering to " apostolic missionaries " of later times (cf. the use of iepasr&rroXos in this sense by the Orthodox Eastern Church to-day)would help to account for the apostolic claims of the missionaries censured in Rev. ii. 2, as also for the " apostles " of the second generation implied in the Didache.In the sub-apostolic age, however, the class of " missionaries " enjoying a charisma such as was conceived to convey apostolic commission through the Spirit, soon became distinguished from " apostles " (cf. Hermas, Sim. ix. 15. 4, " the apostles and teachers of the message of the Son of God," so 25. 2; in 17. I the apostles are reckoned as twelve), as the title became more and more confined by usage to the original apostles, particularly the Twelve as a body (e.g. Ascension of Isaiah and the Preaching of Peter), or to them and Paul (e.g. in Clement and Ignatius), and as reverence for these latter grew in connexion with their story in the Gospels and in Acts.' Thus Eusebius describes as " evangelists " (cf. Philip the Evangelist in Acts xxi. 8, also Eph. iv. 11, 2 Tim. iv. 5) those who " occupied the first rank in the succession to the Apostles " in missionary work (Hist. Eccl. iii..87, cf. v. so). Yet the wider sense of " apostle " did not at once die out even in the third and fourth generations. It lingered on as applied to the Seventy2by Irenaeus, Tertullian, Clement and Origenand even to Clement of Rome, by Clem. Alex. (? as a " fellow-worker " of Paul, Phil. iv. 3); while the adjective " apostolic " was applied to men like Polycarp
The authority attaching to apostles was essentially spiritual in character and in the conditions of its exercise. Anything like autocracy among his followers was alien to Jesus's own teaching (Matt. xxiii. 6-11). All Christians were " brethren," and the basis of pre-eminence among them was relative ability for service. But the personal relation of the original Palestinian apostles to Jesus himself as Master gave them a unique fitness as authorized witnesses, from which flowed naturally, by sheer spiritual influence, such special forms of authority as they came gradually to exercise in the early Church. " There is no trace in Scripture of a formal commission of authority for government from Christ Himself " (Hort, Chr. Eccl. p. 84) given to apostles, save as representing the brethren in their collective action. Even the " resolutions " (51 yara) of the Jerusalem conference were not set forth by the apostles present simply in their own name, nor as ipso facto binding on the conscience of the Antiochene Church. They expressed " a claim to deference rather than a right to be obeyed " (Hort, op. cit. 81-85). Such was the kind of authority attaching to apostles, whether collectively or individually. It was not a fixed notion, but varied in quantity and quality with The tendency is already visible in the Lucan writings. An analogous process is seen in the use of " disciple," applicable in the apostolic age to Christians at large, but in the course of the sub-apostolic age restricted to personal " disciples of the Lord " or to martyrs (Papias in Eus. iii. 39, cf. Ignatius, Ad Eph. i. 2). 2 In the Edessene legend of Abgar
The authority attaching to apostles as writers, which led gradually to the formation of a New Testament Canon" the Apostles " side by side with " the Books " of the Old Testament (so 2 Clement xiv., c. A.D. I20-140)is a subject by itself (see BIBLE). This change of conception helped to further the notion of a certain devolution of apostolic powers to successors constituted by act of ordination. The earliest idea of an apostolical succession meant simply the re-emergence in others of the apostolic spirit of missionary enthusiasm. " The first rank in the succession of the apostles " consisted of men eminent as disciples of theirs, and so fitted to continue their labours (Euseb. iii. 37); and even under Commodus (A.D. 180-193) there were " evangelists of the word " possessed of " inspired zeal to emulate apostles " (v. so). Such were perhaps the " apostles " of the Didache. Of the notion of apostolic succession in ministerial grace conferred by ordination, there is little or no trace before Irenaeus. The famous passage in Clement of Rome (xliv. 2) refers simply to the succession of one set of men to another in an office of apostolic institution. The grace that makes Polycarp
2 The above is substantially the view taken by J. B. Lightfoot in his essay on " The Christian Ministry " (Comm. on Philippians, 6th ed., pp. 239, 252 f.), and by T. M. Lindsay, The Church and the Ministry (11902), pp. 224-228, 278 if. Even C. Gore, The Church and the Ministry (1889), pp. 119 if., while inferring a sacerdotal element in Irenaeus's conception of the episcopate, says: " But it is mainly as preserving the catholic traditions that Irenaeus regards the apostolic succession " (p. 120). 4 See Lightfoot's essay for Cyprian's contribution, as also for that of the Clementines, which fix on the twofold position of James at Jerusalem, as apostle and bishop, as bearing on apostolic succession in the episcopate. Dogmengeschichte (3rd ed.), i. 153 ff.; E. Haupt, Zum Verstdndnis d. Apostolats in NT. (Halle, 1896) ; and. especially H. Monnier, La Notion de l'apostolat, des origines a Irenee (Paris, 1903). The later legends and their sources are examined by T. Schermann, Prophetenund Apostellegenden ( Leipzig
End of Article: APOSTIL, or APOSTILLE (possibly connected with Lat. appositum, placed near) If you wish, you can link directly to this article.
<a href="http://jcsm.org/StudyCenter/Encyclopedia/APO_ARN/APOSTIL_or_APOSTILLE_possibly_.html"> APOSTIL, or APOSTILLE (possibly connected with ... </a> |
|
|
(Previous) APOSTASY (aaoafiavis, in classical Greek a defe... |
(Next) APOSTLE SPOONS |
Free & Cheap Cell
Phones |
Cheap Long Distance
Phone Service Carriers |
Talk America Local Phone Service
|
Ztel & MCI - Unlimited Long Distance
Compare
Cell Phone Plans & Companies |
International Calling Cards & Prepaid Phone Cards |
Voice Over IP Broadband Internet Phone
Service | Wireless
Phone Plans & Cheap Cell Phones
|
_____________________________________________________________________________
Online First Aid and CPR Certification . The Online Christ Centered Ministries . The Skeptic's Annotated Bible: Corrected and Explained . The Inerrancy Discussion Board . Free Email Accounts . Home Equity Loans . JasonGastrich.com . The Missions, Apologetics, and Creation Bible Conference . Young Earth Creation Science . San Diego Music Lessons . 10,000 Wise Quotes and Spiritual Sayings . Gastrich.net . Maximizing the Internet: 12 Keys to Success . Louisiana Baptist University . NKJV Web Hosting and Services . Michael Newdow . San Diego Soccer Training . Christian Guitar Lessons . Jesus Christ Saves Ministries . Eternal Security
