|
|
![]() Helping San Diego, California and beyond since 1997.
|
|
Click here and add this page to your favorites!

|
Encyclopedia Britannica - Main :: ALM-ANC |
|
|
AMPHIBIA , a zoological term originally employed by Linnaeus to denote a class of the Animal Kingdom comprising crocodiles, lizards and salamanders, snakes
snakes
In 1799' Alexandre Brongniart pointed out the wide differences which separate
original
zoology , proposed to separate
Cuvier went no further than Brongniart, and, in the Regne Animal, he dropped the term Amphibia, and substituted Reptilia for it. J. F. Meckel,3 on the other hand, while equally accepting Brongniart's classification, retained the term Amphibia in its earlier Linnaean sense; and his example has been generally followed by German writers, as, for instance, by H. Stannius, in that remarkable monument of accurate and extensive research, the Handbuch der Zootomie (2nd ed., 1856).In 1816, de Blairsville,' adopting Latreille's view, divided the Linnaean Amphibia into Squamiferes and Nudipelliferes, or Amphibiens; though he offered an alternative arrangement, in which the class Reptiles is preserved and divided into two sub-classes, the Ornithoides and the Ichthyoides. The latter are Brongniart's Batrachia, plus the Caeciliae, whose true affinities had, in the meanwhile, been shown by A. M. C. Dumeril; and, in this arrangement, the name Amphibiens is restricted to Proteus and Siren. B. Merrem's Pholidota and Batrachia (182o), F. S. Leuckart's Monopnoa and Dipnoa (1821), J. Miller's Squamata and Nuda (1832), are merely new names for de Blainville's Ornithoides and Ichthyoides, though Muller gave far better anatomical characters of the two groups than had previously been put forward. More- 1 Brongniart's Essai d'une classification naturelle des reptiles was not published in full till 1803. It appears in the volume of the Mimoires presentes a I'Inslitut par divers savans for 1805. 2 Nouveau dictionnaire d'histoire naturelle, xxiv., cited in Latreille's Families naturelles du regne animal. 5 System der vergleichenden Anatomie (1821). ' " Prodrome d'une Nouvelle Distribution du Regne Animal," Bulletin des sciences par la Societe Philomalique de Paris (1816), p.113. AMPHIBOLE 8 8 3 over, following the indications already given by K. E. von Baer in 1828,5 Muller calls the attention of naturalists to the important fact, that while all the Squamata possess an amnion and an allantois, these structures are absent in the embryos of all the Nuda. An appeal made by Muller for observations on the development of the Caeciliae, and of those Amphibia which retain gills or gill-clefts throughout life, has unfortunately yielded no fruits. In 1825 P. A. Latreille6 published a new classification of the Vertebrata, which are primarily divided into Haematherma, containing the three classes of Mammifera, Monotremata and Aves; and Ilaemacryma, also containing three classesReptilia, Amphibia and Pisces. This division of the Vertebrata into hot and cold blooded is a curiously retrograde step, only intelligible when we reflect that the excellent entomologist had no real comprehension of vertebrate morphology; but he makes some atonement for the blunder by steadily upholding the class distinctness of the Amphibia. In this he was followed by Dr J. E. Gray; but Dumeril and Bibron in their great
work
Mammalia , Aves, Reptilia and Pisces; and the same arrangement was accepted by Gegenbaur and Haeckel. In the Hunterian lectures delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons in 1863, Huxley divided the Vertebrata into Mammals, Sauroids and Ichthyoids, the latter division containing the Amphibia and Pisces. Subsequently he proposed the names of Sauropsida and Ichthyopsida for the Sauroids and Ichthyoids respectively.Sir Richard Owen, in his work
End of Article: AMPHIBIA If you wish, you can link directly to this article.
<a href="http://jcsm.org/StudyCenter/Encyclopedia/ALM_ANC/AMPHIBIA.html"> AMPHIBIA </a> |
|
|
(Previous) AMPHIARAUS |
(Next) AMPHIBOLE |
|
Sponsored Advertisements